tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post2906094747140707630..comments2024-01-04T07:05:27.381-06:00Comments on Immigration Talk with a Mexican American: Judge Sotomayor and my Lesson from Eighth GradeDeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comBlogger38125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-80042486484174892162009-07-22T09:36:06.483-05:002009-07-22T09:36:06.483-05:00Actually, the BLEACHING OF AMERICA is an excellent...Actually, the BLEACHING OF AMERICA is an excellent term for what your side is attempting to do with your moves for Mass Deportation, Change in the 14th Ammendment and Reduced/Regulated future Immigration. I coined the term. I am keeping it!!<br /><br />In fact, I am going to write a blog about it announcing the New Term!!Deehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-62605312811709933112009-07-22T09:28:09.724-05:002009-07-22T09:28:09.724-05:00Ultima,
You know as well as I do that the restrict...Ultima,<br />You know as well as I do that the restrictionist cities/towns that have instituted their version of English Only laws have experienced problems with anyone speaking anything other than English. There have been cases where individuals were fired for speaking spanish with co-workers on their breaks. Once these restrictionist laws are imposed, how long before we get more people slugging innocent strangers on the streets for private conversations on their cell phones? (rememember the articles I published with these cases?)<br /><br />You know as well as I do the reason YOU want these laws imposed is to STOP the printing of government documents in Spanish or any other language. You especially want this on any voting documents. It is easy to understand your motivations. Reprehensible!<br /><br />The facts are, English is already the National language. I see no problem with people speaking multiple languages. In Europe, most people speak four or five languages. The only paranoia is yours -- your FEAR of Spanish!Deehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-70132351185923973292009-07-22T02:36:19.118-05:002009-07-22T02:36:19.118-05:00Dee,
In your response to Joe, I noticed an intere...Dee,<br /><br />In your response to Joe, I noticed an interesting line:<br /><i>"I do not understand why you have more fear of Mexico than you have of our own USA."</i><br /><br />While I can't speak for Joe's opinion or experience, I will offer mine as stated before:<br />Juarez and other cities like it.<br /><br />I've been to Mexico, and have no plans to return in any quick fashion to say the least. Mexico is a mess. The blatant racism, hypocrisy, and how they treat their southern border are all reasons for my boycott. That, and I choose life, meaning I'd rather live than go to that country. <br /><br />You are correct though. We have all stated our opinions and facts as they appear, but those statements need to be re-stated from time to time due to short memories and new visitors. <br /><br />Personally, I would welcome Joe into the fray of debate, just don't barrage him.....https://www.blogger.com/profile/04308481390438662506noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-78244004566543263312009-07-21T20:08:39.629-05:002009-07-21T20:08:39.629-05:00Joe,
I do not understand why you have more fear of...Joe,<br />I do not understand why you have more fear of Mexico than you have of our own USA. We have more drug dealers and drugs in the USA than any other country in the world. Go to any city or suburb. Our neighborhoods are loaded with drugs. <br /><br />I think one of the challenges our President/Government must address next year (after our issues this year - economy, healthcare and immigration) is ending our country's addiction on both illegal and prescription drugs.Deehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-3348392643407642412009-07-21T20:05:46.433-05:002009-07-21T20:05:46.433-05:00Ultima's language is ludicrous. When he spouts...Ultima's language is ludicrous. When he spouts words like "Mexifornia" or "Mexico Norte" these are just hatefilled terms to demonize the issue.<br /><br />Do I have positive words for Mexico? Of course. They are their own country. They are doing their best to resolve their issues. I admire the fact that they took a strong stance on the swine flu and they were proactive in facing the issues with this disease head on. That is why we are not seeing a much worse impact than we did. This is due to their proactivity. I also admire the fact that their government is partnering with ours in dealing with their drug issues. The USA is the number 1 abuser of drugs in the world. Many countries, including Mexico, have various groups attempting to be our drug dealers. Thanks to Mexico's diligence, we are seeing massive attacks against the drug cartels and a vast reduction of money/drugs into their country. This is a good thing because in the long run this will help our country end/minimize our reliance on drugs.Deehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-41206485436304602182009-07-21T19:59:28.674-05:002009-07-21T19:59:28.674-05:00Joe,
Ultima and I have had this "argument&qu...Joe,<br /><br />Ultima and I have had this "argument" hundreds of times before. Before I publish his usual responses, which he has already written, I want to respond to you.<br /><br />First, you have to understand. The 12M are NOT coming from ONE country. They are coming from numerous countries, many of them Latin, south of the border countries. Many are coming from Central America and South America, not just Mexico. Stop coloring them all with the same brush. Every country is different. Every country has their own positives and negatives. When you say "what they are leaving behind" don't be falling for Ultima's argument. Who says Columbia or Argentina or Brazil have the same issues. Don't believe the rhetoric you hear from Ultima. You don't know. Unless you go there, unless you understand each individual from each location, don't pretend they are, as Tom Tancredo says, "3rd world countries." And don't pretend you know the reasons for the backlogs and immigration issues within each country. Many of the backlog issues are within our own courts. Study the issues. Study the backlogs. Study the reasons for the issues. Then decide how you feel about them.Deehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-89722969785362365302009-07-21T14:08:47.581-05:002009-07-21T14:08:47.581-05:00Recession Over - Stimulus Plan staves off a bigger...<b>Recession Over - Stimulus Plan staves off a bigger downturn - Jobless Recovery - Professor Brad DeLong, U. C. Berkeley</b><br /><br />The jobless recovery has begun<br />The recession is very likely over and Democrats running in 2010 can credit the stimulus plan for staving off a bigger downturn. But when do the jobs return?<br /><br />The Week<br />THE BULLPEN<br />BY Brad DeLong<br />July 21, 2009<br /><br />Brad DeLong is a professor in the Department of Economics at U.C. Berkeley; chair of its Political Economy major; a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research; and from 1993 to 1995 he worked for the U.S. Treasury as a deputy assistant secretary for economic policy. He has written on, among other topics, the evolution and functioning of the U.S. and other nations' stock markets, the course and determinants of long-run economic growth, the making of economic policy, the changing nature of the American business cycle, and the history of economic thought.<br /><br />The jobless recovery has begun<br />http://www.theweek.com/bullpen/column/98770/The_jobless_recovery_has_begun<br /><br />Some excerpts :<br /><br />"The hypothesis is that firms believe that their remaining workers will forgive them if they fire large numbers of workers during a recession out of economic necessity, but not at other times. Hence the start of the recovery is a business' last moment to slim down its labor force and become more efficient and profitable in the coming boom.<br /><br />At least it is likely to be a recovery. The prevailing forecast right now is for real GDP to contract at a rate of one percent per year or less between the first and second quarters of 2009, followed by growth between the second and third quarters at an annual rate of two percent or so. When the NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee gets around to it, it is most likely to call the end of this recession for June 2009, with the second most likely call for April and a date sometime after June 2009 as a less likely possibility.<br /><br />Yes, that would mean the recession is over right now. One reason for that is the much-maligned stimulus package, which probably boosted the real GDP annual growth rate by about one percentage point in the second quarter of 2009, and will boost it by another two percentage points between now and the summer of 2010. (After that, its effects will not only tail off, but actually exert a drag on subsequent GDP growth, which is why White House Council of Economic Advisors Chair Christina Romer has been warning of the dangers of pulling the plug on economic stimulus too soon.)<br /><br />Politically, the question "did the stimulus work?" might well be answered in the affirmative. Democratic members of Congress seeking reelection in 2010 will be able to point to real GDP growth and an official end to the recession in the second quarter of 2009. However, that is probably not the most relevant question to ask.<br /><br />Comparing the second quarter of this year to the first, work-hours have declined at a rate of six percent annually. Unless new unemployment claims fall precipitously, work-hours from the second to third quarter will decline at a rate of about three percent per year. Productivity is growing not because of new investment in technology but because businesses continue to fire what workers they can, knowing that in so lousy an economy they won't be blamed for it.<br /><br />Barring much faster real GDP growth than is currently in the cards, we appear destined for another jobless recovery. So the answer to the question "did the stimulus work?" depends on the metric you use. If the metric is the unemployment rate, the answer is very likely to be: No. Why? Because it was too small."<br /><br />****************<br /><br />In MILENIALS.COM I am fattening a big page of Links to Obama saving the Economy and bringing prosperity ( with excerpts and my comments ) :<br /><br /><a href="http://milenials.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-obama-saves-economy-making-of-great.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>How Obama saves the Economy - The Making of a Great President - The Best Economists Opine - Links</strong></a><br /><br />Vicente DuqueDefensores de Democraciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01990488344886411353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-49492800969623906752009-07-21T12:35:40.581-05:002009-07-21T12:35:40.581-05:00"We do have 50M Hispanic citizens in our coun..."We do have 50M Hispanic citizens in our country."<br /><br />That factoid alone makes my point quite well. Have you ever considered extrapolating that factoid to the America of 50 or 100 years from now? Honestly, what will it really be like <br />then?ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-14946134521988586472009-07-21T12:31:59.347-05:002009-07-21T12:31:59.347-05:00Dee wrote, "We are the people you truly fear....Dee wrote, "We are the people you truly fear."<br /><br />I have no fear of law-abiding citizens. I do fear those who oppose the rule of law because of what they will do to our country.<br /><br />What would be the basis for any fear other than that? Can you cite any?ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-12589403175229622922009-07-21T12:28:20.416-05:002009-07-21T12:28:20.416-05:00So I guess this all means you subscribe to the ten...So I guess this all means you subscribe to the tenets of Islam and sharia and wouldn't mind living under them as some already do in this country and in most of Europe.<br /><br />Do you know how many mosques there are in the U.S.? Do you know what the imams preach there (jihad!)? Did you know that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world? Better read up on it so you will be better informed on what you are letting yourself in for when you defend Muslims?<br /><br />So far your comments show a singular lack of depth on the Islamic revolution and what it will mean.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-81223540522383595222009-07-21T12:23:20.980-05:002009-07-21T12:23:20.980-05:00Dee
wrote, "You fear Brown people. Your move...Dee <br />wrote, "You fear Brown people. Your movement fears the changing demographics in our country. We do have 50M Hispanic citizens in our country. We are all Americans."<br /><br />I have no fear of Brown people. I have no fear of the changing demographics unless they portend Mexico Norte with all the ills of the original. You have 50 million Hispanic citizens and growing and yet you are in denial about Mexico Norte. Good luck with that.<br /><br />This is the analog of the Muslim takeover in Europe. I guess you approve of that. That takeover is a demographic fact not an opinion. The 750,000 Muslims in LA should enable you to see that it could happen here also in the long run. And if it does it will be because of unenforced immigration laws and those who want to liberalize them even more. I guess if you don't mind thinking about some of your female descendents in a burqa and the males gravitating to Islam, you have nothing to worry about (Alfred E. Neuman).<br /><br />Read the book. Enlarge your horizons and your perspective. Tunnel vision and myopia won't help you to understand that there is a world beyond the anti-America, pro-illegal agenda.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-78891748293793083602009-07-21T12:13:33.283-05:002009-07-21T12:13:33.283-05:00Dee wrote, "You cite baseless assumptions and...Dee wrote, "You cite baseless assumptions and horror stories.."<br /><br />What are my baseless assumptions and why are they of less value than your equally baseless assumptions? Read the book!<br /><br />In the meantime, list my baseless assumptions and then confess your own. Don't you see they are two sides of the same coin?ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-57485298359526944092009-07-21T12:10:09.609-05:002009-07-21T12:10:09.609-05:00Dee wrote, "Your talking points are the same ...Dee wrote, "Your talking points are the same talking points used by Teddy Roosevelt when he demonized the waves of German immigrants coming into the US during the turn of the last century. Roosevelt also criticized Native Americans using words "wrong kind of immigrants" when referencing both German and Native Americans, much the same way you are demonizing Muslims and Latinos."<br /><br />Well there are many who think Teddy was a great president. Of course it is ridiculous to speak of Native Americans as the wrong kind of immigrants. With regard to Germans, even though my grandparents on my mother's side came from Germany, one has to think about what World War II would have been like if Germans remained the predominant culture in America and if we had a remained a German-speaking people.<br /><br />I do not demonize Latinos and Muslims. I just tell it like it is. Read the book with an open mind then let's discuss the Muslim threat.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-84772565401051024052009-07-21T12:04:04.902-05:002009-07-21T12:04:04.902-05:00Dee wrote, "Your ANTI Immigration Reform argu...Dee wrote, "Your ANTI Immigration Reform argument is the same as provided by most in your movement."<br /><br />I guess that validates that argument doesn't it. (50 million Frenchmen can't be wrong!)<br /><br />In general you again misstate the argument as anti-immigration. More accurately it is an anti-illegal, rule of law argument and an stable population argument that drives the pro-America agenda.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-55151852026451617912009-07-21T11:58:52.181-05:002009-07-21T11:58:52.181-05:00Dee Wrote, "Your claims are not facts. The wr...Dee Wrote, "Your claims are not facts. The writers of the books you reference are more from your side."<br /><br />Well of course. If you were citing a book, would it be one written by a Neolib, Hispanic, Leftwing writer or a rightwing,conservative, white writer?<br /><br />To make any sense one has to deal with the facts and opinions expressed rather than what part of the poltical spectrum one comes from or his race for that matter.<br /><br />The book I cited has been on the "liberal" New York Times best seller list. It includes some very cogent opinion well-supported with facts. But it would be of no interest to a closed mind.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-12108116126113628462009-07-21T11:50:51.148-05:002009-07-21T11:50:51.148-05:00Dee wrote, "what the worst on your side are c...Dee wrote, "what the worst on your side are capable of, ala Shawna Forde and Gunny Bush, and the perpetrators of all the Hate Crimes against Latinos."<br /><br />You keep reminding us of that but not of all the Mexicans incarcerated in CA and elsewhere for there heinous crimes. I doubt that the rape, robbery, DUI, or murder victims of illegal aliens would worry very much about so-called hate crimes against Latinos.<br />In fact, other minorities are often the victim. So much for the balance in your arguments.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-91477017950119718982009-07-21T11:44:36.001-05:002009-07-21T11:44:36.001-05:00Dee wrote,". More and more Americans are beco...Dee wrote,". More and more Americans are becoming enlightened to the truth..."<br /><br />Not enough when one rejects out of hand any point of view that differs from one's own that's not enlightenment. It's more like the dark ages.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-22136685522759422352009-07-21T11:42:09.933-05:002009-07-21T11:42:09.933-05:004. As you well know I have never advocated the ov...4. As you well know I have never advocated the overnight repatriation of 12 million illegal aliens. That would be bad for them and would also damage our economy. Moreover, again, as you well know, I have proposed various ways of sorting out those who have taken jobs Americans would take, especially now with unemployment creeping into the double digit range, if offered a living wage and a hiring preference. Regular and prompt repatriations of a somewhat larger number than we are currently doing would begin to turn the situation around without any draconian mass deportation of all illegals. But you knew that before you wrote your "diatribe".<br />5. This one really shows your paranoia. I have always been an advocate of limiting legal immigration more precisely to our real needs rather than being governed by the demand. Anyone but an idiot realizes that we cannot take everyone who would like to come here and still maintain any semblance of the quality of life and standard of living we enjoy.If we need temporary migrant workers, we should change the law to permit an orderly process for meeting that need. If we have to choose between an top scientist or engineer and others who have nothing to offer, the choice is clear. We shoulde limit legal immigrants to no more than 200,000 per year, the historical level, and focus that quota on those who can be of the greatest value to our economy and to our competitiveness in the world. It doesn't make any difference what their race or color is. To make it simple for you, think of it as a job interview. Who would you want to hire for your business if you had one? You might see things differently if you knew your business was going to flourish or founder based on your choice.<br /><br />Everyone knows about the "browning of America". It is a fact so any talk of the "bleaching of America" is pure unadulterated nonsense and you know it.<br /><br />Like the Europeans, you are unable to face reality.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-12265694256162005992009-07-21T11:41:36.602-05:002009-07-21T11:41:36.602-05:00I note that Joe did not characterize my essay as a...I note that Joe did not characterize my essay as a "diatribe" and I would have joined him in being interested in your response.<br /><br />First let me deal with your numbered responses:<br /><br />1. Apparently you are so paranoid that you cannot see that Official English and a National Language has nothing whatsoever to do with what language one is allowed to speak. It merely addresses the issue of government spending to produce documents and services in several languages for people who are supposed to know English to even be eligible for citizenship and the services it provides. What is you motivation in continuing to purposely misconstruing the language issue.<br /><br />2. As you well know many countries do not have birthright citizenship so that idea requires no defense. Birthright citizenship represents a strong incentive for illegals to sneek across the border to have a baby and then use family separation as part of their appeal if they are apprehended and ordered removed. Keeping anchor babies with their parents is the humane thing to do if the parents are deported. There are some technical issues related to the elimination of birthright citizenship that would need to be studied. But any advocate of secure borders, north and south, which you have been whenever it served your purposes, has to be in favor of removing this incentive for border violations.<br />3. Take whatever actions we can to seal the borders all around. This doesn't mean mine fields, guard towers, or shoot on sight. It means improving infrastructure and staffing; it means creating disincentives by using E-verify to deny employment opportunities and enable prompt apprehension and repatriation. Without these measures border and port security is a pipe dream. You say you are in favor of secure borders because that is politically correct but what you really mean is open borders because you would deny us the tools necessary to achieve at least a major improvement in border and port security. The only distinction I make between the southern and northern borders is that the largest volume is from the south as you well know but conveniently overlook. I am concerned about the Canadian border because its misguided immigration policies allow too many potential jihadists and terrorists to enter their country.ultimahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13624967903736347171noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-55937918422961308602009-07-21T10:54:08.026-05:002009-07-21T10:54:08.026-05:00I do not fear "brown people". I fear tha...I do not fear "brown people". I fear that this country will be just like the country Mexicans are leaving behind. Do you have any positive words about Mexico?Joenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-87058773760126864452009-07-21T10:51:19.041-05:002009-07-21T10:51:19.041-05:00ultima said:
The worrisome thing is that they had...ultima said:<br /><br />The worrisome thing is that they had to come here because they were not able to get their own houses in order in their homelands -- more often than not, countries characterized by corruption, poverty, crime, oligarchs, and overpopulation. What is there in that picture to give anyone an optimistic view of America's future? Isn't it more likely, as I have stated many times, that in the long run immigrants in such large numbers will tend to re-create the very conditions they left their homelands to escape, if not by their actions and culture then by their sheer numbers that overcome the capacity of the land on which we all depend<br /><br />This is what I am concerned about. Never in the history of the U.S. has so many people from ONE country<br />entered the U.S. This is why there are quotas on the number of people who can enter from different countries. It appears that Mexico has exhausted and exceeded their quota for entry into the U.S. Do you agree?Joenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-79812668229063594492009-07-21T09:48:07.445-05:002009-07-21T09:48:07.445-05:00I will be writing more tonight on this subject. I ...I will be writing more tonight on this subject. I will talk about the current broken immigration processes in more detail.Deehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-23025581055830351642009-07-21T09:39:15.796-05:002009-07-21T09:39:15.796-05:00Ultima, Joe asked that I respond to your diatribe ...Ultima, Joe asked that I respond to your diatribe (your usual) on Immigration. Here is my response:<br /><br />Your ANTI Immigration Reform argument is the same as provided by most in your movement.<br /><br />You cite baseless assumptions and horror stories to instill fear in readers of your diatribe so they will join your side. <br /><br />Your claims are not facts. The writers of the books you reference are more from your side.<br /><br />Your talking points are the same talking points used by Teddy Roosevelt when he demonized the waves of German immigrants coming into the US during the turn of the last century. Roosevelt also criticized Native Americans using words "wrong kind of immigrants" when referencing both German and Native Americans, much the same way you are demonizing Muslims and Latinos. <br /><br />You remind me of the child in the movie Sixth Sense, only you do not fear dead people. You fear Brown people. Your movement fears the changing demographics in our country. We do have 50M Hispanic citizens in our country. We are all Americans. We are the people you truly fear.<br /><br />You use such politically correct terms when you really mean:<br />1. English Only = Stop anyone from speaking spanish<br />2. Change 14th Ammendment = No more "anchor" babies and send back those here<br />3. Build a Wall: Seal off the Southern Border - forever. Don't care about canadian border or ports<br />4. Strict Enforcement of existing laws = Mass Deportation of the 12M and their children<br />5. Controlled Immigration = Only allow White Educated Northern Europeans to immigrate.<br /><br />GOAL: The Bleaching of America <br /><br />You may as well get over your fears. We are a thriving, multi cultural society in America and we will continue to grow and thrive. We are not overpopulated as you suggest. In fact, we are the opposite. Without the influx of newer immigrants (legal and illegal), many towns/cities would have died out. We have witnessed the effect of massive deportations during the ICE Raids in Postville, Iowa. The town is now out of business. Multiply that by a thousand cities and witness the impact of mass deporting 12M workers and their sales revenues/contributions.<br /><br />Your fear tactics scare only the uneducated. More and more Americans are becoming enlightened to the truth and what the worst on your side are capable of, ala Shawna Forde and Gunny Bush, and the perpetrators of all the Hate Crimes against Latinos. <br /><br />I am glad our President Obama has asked us to talk about Immigration and what we can do to improve our broken processes. It is through dialogue and discussion that we can discuss the truth and not just your side's fear tactics.<br /><br />BTW, NCLR (you call it La Raza), MALDEF and other groups are Humanitarian organizations with long histories of helping people. They are like the NAACP, with histories of hope and help for minorities. I am glad they are here, helping Americans.<br /><br />God Bless America<br />God Bless President ObamaDeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583438645860375661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-57643765081714037422009-07-20T22:00:25.119-05:002009-07-20T22:00:25.119-05:00I am very interested in your response to ultima...I am very interested in your response to ultima's post shown above about immigration. How do you counter what he says? I am interested in what you have to say.Joenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5548695401579410439.post-3146616152539790172009-07-20T17:36:37.229-05:002009-07-20T17:36:37.229-05:00Anti-Sonia Hypocrisy and Superb Ignorance :
The R...<b>Anti-Sonia Hypocrisy and Superb Ignorance :</b><br /><br />The Ricci Decision of the Supreme Court and Conservative Judicial Activism<br /><br />There is a Great Dissatisfaction and Protest of Great Lawyers, Jurists, Experts in Constitutional Law, Professors of Law. Great Inconformity and Disagreement with the Supreme Court.<br /><br />There are so many learned articles condemning the Supreme Court on Ricci and other decisions, that I have assembled a page of links on these hot-red topics.<br /><br />Here :<br /><br /><a href="http://milenials.blogspot.com/2009/07/blog-post_4123.html" rel="nofollow"><strong>Links to Supreme Court and its Conservative Judicial Activism - Hurting Civil Rights and Minorities</strong></a><br /><br />Vicente DuqueDefensores de Democraciahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01990488344886411353noreply@blogger.com