The Republican National Committee members received a very "fun" gift from one of their members this Christmas. They received a CD with the songs: "Barack the Magic Negro" and "The Star Spanglish Banner." The CD was created and promoted by the Rush Limbaugh show. The gift giver was RNC candidate Chip Saltsman, former campaign manager of Republican former Prez candidate Mike Huckabee.
The Limbaugh CD was called "We Hate the USA!" (Limbaugh must hate us all!!)
Limbaugh´s lyrics to the Magic Negro song are sung to the melody "Puff the Magic Dragon" and the lyrics include:
Barack the Magic Negro lives in D.C.
..cause hes black but not authentically
some say Barack's articulate
and bright and new and clean
the media sure love this guy
a white interloper's dream
"The Star Spanglish Banner" song has Speedy Gonzales sing the lyrics which include:
..cross the border we sailed
as the gringos were sleeping..
jose does that starspangled banner yet wave
hore de land of weak knees and we see no ones brave.
The EXCUSE the Racist Limbaugh, Saltsman and the RNC provide are, "Oh we were just kidding! It was just a Parody!"
One thing is very Clear! Limbaugh and the RNC recipients who laughed at this deplorable excuse for humor are, without a doubt, Racist for doing this! This would be similar to sending out a CD with "Nazi Ovens were Fun!" or "Japanese Internment Camps provide Enjoyable Summers!" or "The Trail of Tears is good Camping!" More FUN Parodies!
The Republican National Committee JUST DOES NOT GET IT!! They have YET to Refute Limbaugh for his Racist Tactics!!
We are a Nation of Immigrants, of ALL Ethnicities! We are ALL EQUAL!!
Our Country is NOT about the Privileged Only! We do not Pander to the Rich Bankers! (except under Bush Economics!) The RNC´s Reign of Terror is OVER!!!
Will the Republicans ever get it? Will they ever understand that until they STOP their Racist Ways and be willing to accept and embrace ALL of us Americans of Color, WE WILL NOT VOTE FOR YOU AGAIN!! (Will they ever, ever Refute Limbaugh OR his tactics!!.... WE LATINOS and MINORITIES ARE WAITING!)
Thankfully Obama WON THE ELECTION and perhaps we can all proudly say again, "God Bless America, the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!!"
References:
RNC candidate distributes controversial Obama song
Star Spanglish Banner
I also posted this blog on dailykos.
ReplyDeleteI am so angry at Limbaugh and his supporters for this blatant RACIST attack on Obama and people of color!!!
Shame on him and the RNC!!
Here is my post on dailykos. I have already received many, many comments!
ReplyDeleteTheir very HATE and RACIST Talk is the TYPE of talk that CAUSES ALL of the HATE CRIMES!!
ReplyDeleteSHAME ON LIMBAUGH AND THE RNC!!!!
All commenters are asked to abide by the rules of the blog:
ReplyDelete1. Stick to topic
2. Remain Civil
So you continue to do the same with the Republicans by grouping them ALL together just as you do ALL the anti's? Does that include ALL Republican politicans and all American citizens who are registered Republicans? Do you know how ridiculous that is to do that? The Democrats aren't angels either but should we judge every Democrat politician and every American citizen who is z registered Democrat for the sins of some Democrats? Grow up will you?
ReplyDeleteDee, aren't you the one always complaining and claiming that the anti's are judging all Latinos whether they be legal or illegal, as a group rather than individuals? Yet you are doing the exact same thing with your negative judgements of the entire Republican party and their constituents and the entire group of anti's. Hypocricy anyone?
ReplyDeleteI hated the original leftist song and I don't like this one either. By the way, Spike Lee invented the term "Magic Negro" for the black movie character that shows up out of nowhere to help out the white guy. Think Bagger Vance. So Spike Lee was the start of this racism, blame him.
ReplyDeleteSeriously, those on the Left have no sense of humor at all unless it's anti-Semitic.
Anon, Dee is not the only nutbag on Kos. I have yet to read a single one of them that is not.
Anon,
ReplyDeleteYou are going to have to READ THE POST then COMMENT ON IT or you will be DELETED going forward!
Talk about Limbaugh, his use of Barack the Magic Negro, the RNC, The email sent to the RNC, and other aspects of this post. That is the topic!
2Dogs,
ReplyDeleteI checked your blog. Your description of yourself suits you, "I am a self-absorbed, egotistical, loud-mouthed, crazed lunatic. Your Momma would think that I'm the best thing that she has ever seen."
Thanks for the visit, Dee. Sorry there is nothing there up your alley, but I am not crazy in your manner.
ReplyDeleteThose WERE my comments about this topic. Not ALL Republicans think alike or claim Limbaugh as a pal of theirs, so why would the whole Republican party never gain the Latino or miniority vote again for something that Limbaugh said or did?
ReplyDeleteShould all Democrats be blamed for Obama attending an anti-white, anti-American church for several years? See what I mean?
Actually 2Dogs, if you want to get an accurate description, you could reference the wiki description "The magical negro (sometimes called the mystical negro or magic negro) is a supporting, often mystical stock character in fiction who, by use of special insight or powers, helps the white protagonist get out of trouble. The word negro, now considered by many as archaic and offensive, is used intentionally to suggest that the archetype is a racist throwback, an update of the "Sambo" and "savage other" stereotypes."
ReplyDeleteSpike Lee did reference the term in an article in 2001.
Bagger Vance is probably a good example. Will Smith hated that character. He signed up for the movie because he thought Vance was the Lead character, not the subordinate.
What you and the others on your side do not understand is Limbaugh uses this reference to ridicule and belittle our President Obama. Just as the other ANTI Latino song "Spanglish Banner" was meant to belittle and ridicule Latinos.
These CDs were sent to the White RNC members. (show me where it wasnt) to ridicule the minorities.
This type of racist humor is NEVER acceptable!
The RNC is too ignorant to understand (as you and anon are) that this type of behavior will DRIVE AWAY MINORITY VOTERS!!
Get a Clue!!
That is why we will NOT vote for the
2Dogs,
ReplyDeleteAnyone with blog names titled "mean ol' meany" or
"I Am a Goddamn Man" is crazy in an asylum type of way!
We see your kind dressed as Santa in LA or on Miami Docks, or here in Dallas last week going crazy on the freeway!
Two Dogs said...
Thanks for the visit, Dee. Sorry there is nothing there up your alley, but I am not crazy in your manner.
Rush Limbaugh and the RNC will NOT see a Latino or minority vote ever, ever again if they continue these racist tactics!!
ReplyDeleteRush Limbaugh isn't running for office so why would he need anyone's vote? Once again that reference to "your side" lumping all Republicans and anti's together as one big racist group. No credit for individual thinking at all. There are many minorities that are already Republicans but most vote Democrat no matter what anyway.
ReplyDeleteDee, while I do not share your closed-minded views toward people of differing opinions, I do agree that your side of the political spectrum is just that way. You are motivated by hate, but that is the way of your guys. Whichever way the wind blows you in the morning is the way that you shall hate that day. However, the Democrat Party and the so-called "Progressives" need the divisiveness of racism to herd your cats. Y'all have to have your daily cause because there is no overall philosophy behind your movement. Your philosphy is ideological chaos.
ReplyDeleteThe reason that my blog is called Mean Ol' Meany is because your side thinks that my philosophical brethren are mean. It is humor, read about a book on it, then people might listen to you instead of shout you down like they do even on Kos.
The GD Man blog was created for a test site that supposedly determines the sex of the writer of the blog. The test found my MoM blog at 70% or so sure that I was male, so I made the GD Man site and it was 92% male. Again, that was a joke, lighten up, Francis, that's why normal people do not like y'all.
Just so you are aware, racism does exist, but just not in the places that your "Progressives" think that it does. You have to look in the mirror.
There are people who think this is funny?
ReplyDeleteI am waiting for the first elected Republican to denounce this.
I will not hold my breath while I wait.
Arizonian,
ReplyDeleteThat is exactly what I told Dee.
Stop judging an entire group by a few radical individuals. But I guess since she wants to keep the victim mentality going for her group she feels the need to do that.
There are people that think that Rush Limbaugh is radical? What is the world do they think about Barry Obama?
ReplyDeleteAnon wrote, "So you [Dee]
ReplyDeletecontinue to do the same with the Republicans by grouping them ALL together just as you do ALL the anti's?"
Dee is losing her short term memory. Even I can remember how she railed against judging all Hispanics or illegal aliens on the basis of the behavior of some [like all those filling up the prisons in California]. Now she is doing the same thing. Similarly, she has accused me of not admitting, what should be self-evident, that some of what I post is opinion. Yet, I have done this every time every time she has raised this issue. A secondary part of that is a failure to acknowledge the facts that are included in such posts, especially if they represent in Al Gore's words, "an inconvenient truth."
I wonder whether Dee has the fortitude right now to admit that her short memory is a real problem.
I am not about to defend that blowhard Limbaugh except to say "that's entertainment."
Ultima,
ReplyDeleteThat is exactly what I pointed out to Dee in another topic also. That it is hypocritical for her to claim that we are judging both illegal and legal Latinos by the actions of some and yet she does the same with all Republicans and all anti's. What did I get for pointing that out? I got called hate-filled among other deragatory words for that. How can she ask for civility from her members in here but not adhere to it herself?
Not only that Ultima, but some of my posts got deleted by her because she just couldn't handle the truth. Is it any wonder that so many left before me such as Liquid, Patriot, Sandra, etc.? Why can't she see the error of her ways? I wasn't off topic either. Some of those replies were to her initial unwarranted personal attacks on me. So essentially she was the one off topic to begin with. I have noticed that you have lasted the longest in here. I don't know how you do it.
ReplyDeleteDee said...
ReplyDeleteRush Limbaugh and the RNC will NOT see a Latino or minority vote ever, ever again if they continue these racist tactics!!
And the threats begin from the almighty Hispanics.
I have totally missed the point of this post, I guess. Is the racist thing that Dee doesn't like white people? I just don't see the racism here, can anyone help me out with that or is it just an inside joke or something?
ReplyDeleteAnon,
ReplyDeleteThis is funny coming from your side.
You blame EVERY ii in the universe for EVERY traffic accident where an ii was involved.
Tsk Tsk. Now you know how it feels!
Anonymous said...
Arizonian,
That is exactly what I told Dee.
Stop judging an entire group by a few radical individuals.
2Dogs,
ReplyDeleteThey KNOW he is our President!
BTW, I have just written a FABLE just for you! I wrote it to help you understand this whole "Magic" issue. I am posting it in my next blog.
Feel flattered that you were my inspiration to write this, just to help you understand.
PS: It is your side that is full of hate! My side is looking for an END to the Hate Crimes and Equality for All!! (but you dont get this point either!)
Two Dogs said...
There are people that think that Rush Limbaugh is radical? What is the world do they think about Barry Obama?
Ulty,
ReplyDeleteQuit being Mr. Sensitive.
This is the 2nd time you brought this up.
Ultima said...
Similarly, she has accused me of not admitting, what should be self-evident, that some of what I post is opinion.
2Dogs,
ReplyDeleteAs I said, I am writing my next blog, a Fable, just for you dear. To help you understand.
Dee, moonbats are the people that want total poverty, that is the only way your Nirvana can be accomplished.
ReplyDeleteYou brought up the term radical for Limbaugh, I asked what you think about Obama's radical personality?
You say Obama is radical after 8 years of YOUR President Bush!!
ReplyDeleteHa Ha Some Joke!
You think Obama is radical.
ReplyDeleteI do not. As I have often said,
Obama spent 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, became the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, created a voter registration drive that registered 150,000 new voters, spent 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spent 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, became chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spent 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees.
Many people say Limbaugh is a radical nutcase.
ReplyDeleteAs others have said, "what Limbaugh really does is harass everybody who disagrees with him on any matter. He uses his program as a way to provide a vicarious thrill to a country of frustrated cowards, who revel in seeing others just like themselves beaten and humiliated on the air, publicly. It's a truly sick phenomenon, and it perfectly encapsulates the spirit of the age we live in, where a monstrous, drug-addled bully like Rush Limbaugh, and his female counterpart, Ann Coulter are so celebrated. In a society that was really proud of itself, he would be living in a cardboard box under an overpass in North Miami, shaking his fist at passing motorists and muttering his hateful diatribes to no one but himself."
Yes, Dee some many people would say that Rush is radical, but no one could ever say that he is more radical than Obama.
ReplyDeleteA community organizer by definition cannot be brilliant. It is a loser job performed by losers, Dee. It contribute nothing to our society except fomenting a victim mentality.
Funny, George W. Bush is the second best president in my lifetime and Obama has the chance to be third. There is no one else that is even close to W since 1964. Obviously Reagan was first. And you cannot dispute that.
Actually 2 Dogs,
ReplyDeleteNot many normal Americans agree with your very odd Opinions.
Thank Heavens!
Most normal people DO say Rush Limbaugh is far more radical and an insecure nutcase to boot!
Community Organizers have indeed provided a wealth of positive contributions to our world. Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta come to mind. As do MLK and Jesus.
As far as W. is concerned, he is polling at the lowest level in Presidential history. Iraqis are comparing him to Hitler and throwing shoes at him. At a recent World Leader conference as the rest of the leaders were shaking hands, NO ONE would shake your W.s hands. It was a pitiful sight. I felt sorry for him.
Obviously your Opinions are now batting 0 for 3. Time to send you back to the minor leagues.
Two Dogs said...
Yes, Dee some many people would say that Rush is radical, but no one could ever say that he is more radical than Obama.
A community organizer by definition cannot be brilliant. It is a loser job performed by losers, Dee. It contribute nothing to our society except fomenting a victim mentality.
Funny, George W. Bush is the second best president in my lifetime and Obama has the chance to be third. There is no one else that is even close to W since 1964. Obviously Reagan was first. And you cannot dispute that.
Cesar Chavez, the farm labor organizer? Dang, you are radical and not very honest.
ReplyDeleteAt a recent World Leader conference as the rest of the leaders were shaking hands, NO ONE would shake your W.s hands.
That statement was so thoroughly debunked only HuffPo and DU are still stating that. Even CNN and Snopes debunked it. Dee, when you get your ideology from people that are stupid, you wind up with stupid ideology.
Now, I stated that Obama has the opportunity to be the third best president in my lifetime, since 1964, and you cannot name a single one other than Reagan that was better. It is not possible.
Here we go with the "your side" rhetoric again lumping all anti's and Republicans together. No respect for our individual thoughts and views. I have never even mentioned any traffic accidents in here so what are you talking about?
ReplyDeleteMost people say W is the worst prez of all time or at least within the bottom 5.
ReplyDeleteRegarding Top presidents, most people start with Lincoln on top.
Then FDR, then Washington. Most usually agree on the top 3.
People can rank any way they want, I suppose. From my lifetime, I would rank JFK, Clinton, and as a Republican, Reagan was the least harmful. Obama has a chance for the top spot! He certainly has no place to go but up from W.
Dear Dee :
ReplyDeleteThanks for your wonderful website and the opportune posts like this one.
Do not worry because of the negative comments. People throw stones to the trees that produce a lot of fruit.
"The envious are ingrates because they spit against the sun that warms and illuminates them". This is by Victor Hugo that encountered such horrible opposition against his plays like "Hernani" and other masterpieces. There were riots in Paris because of the Theatricals.
The best campaigners for Obama 2012 are the Super Idiots : Rush Limbaugh, Lou Dobbs, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly. Intelligent People and the targets of these anchors have to feel Repugnance of their Imbecility. If all the targets of these fools vote Obama, then he will be very difficult to defeat.
Of course, he has to perform well in the Economy. But I am sure of that.
"The dogs bark because we gallop" said Don Quixote to Sancho.
I am trying to understand the Psychology of the Racists and I have started that long and difficult task, here :
Raciality.com
Thanks to the Sun of Dee !
Vicente Duque
I found this post on the Hispanic Business Forum posted by a Hispanic by the name of Chuey in regards to racism, Limbaugh, the Republicans, Democrats and minorities. I give him credit as a Hispanic for telling the unbiased truth.
ReplyDelete"The pendulum swings both ways. I know alot of liberal Democrats who are as bigoted (and racist) as any neo-con I've ever met. They just try and justify it by claiming intellectual superiority; falsely I might add.
Al Franken is a classic example of a loud mouth, cerebrally-zapped, bigoted fool. His counter part Rush Bimbog is as nauseating.
There's a crap load of Democrats who've made racist comments over the years (thereby exposing their racist views) and had it been a GOP the world wouldve exploded. But when a black woman, for example Donna Brazile, made a racist comment, she got a free ticket. Don Imus makes a bonehead racist comment and the villagers chased him with torches and kicked him till he was almost dead. Brazile makes a bonehead racist comment and it's on 24th page of the NY Times next to the article on the spotting of Elvis in a Minneapolis mall.
There's alot of racism and hate in the Democratic party too.....sin knows no party line.
The Democrats have no more of a monopoly on kindness & compassion than the GOP has on morality."
So you would regard an impeached President Clinton as a good one? An administration that had more officials indicted and jailed than any other administration in the history of our country is a good administration? That is radical, too.
ReplyDeleteIf fecklessness and corruption is your standard for good presidents, why did you not mention Jimmy Carter? His administration was the most incompetent of all time.
Those of you that think JFK was a good president, can you name one single piece of legislation that he championed that was passed during his presidency? Without looking it up?
Thank you Vicente!
ReplyDeleteYou are a breath of fresh air!
2Dogs,
ReplyDeleteAll one has to remember when they think of JFK is the Cuban Missile Crisis and lest we forget the Civil Rights legislation passed during his and Johnson´s tenure!
As far as Clinton is concerned, the trumped up charges against Clinton over an extramarital affair were ludicrous. The right wing conspirators at their evilist!!
ReplyDeleteThe Clinton years were the most economically prosperous and peaceful in the entire last 50 years. He ende with a budget surplus which W quickly decimated.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to talk scandals, none can compare to GOP in the last several years. Shall we start with Foley or Craig? At least the Dem Men like adults, vs underage pages or strangers in public toilets.
ReplyDeleteDee, what Civil Rights legislation passed during JFK's administration? Not during Johnson's, Kennedy's. You didn't name Johnson as a better president, you named Kennedy. To which I asked, what did he do? You also named the Cuban Missile crisis. Dang, that was the biggest foreign policy blunder in the last sixty years other than Carter's failure in Iran. That was NOT in any way, shape, or form a Kennedy SUCCESS, it was his biggest FAILURE in any office that he ever held, in fact in his entire life. Well, that we know of now.
ReplyDeleteThe trumped up charges against Clinton? Those that were so trumped up that he accepted disbarment and surrendered his right to practice law to a judge he appointed? Dang! Right Wing Conspiracy!! EEEEK!
Dee, there was no surplus, there is no Santa Claus, nor an Easter Bunny. There is no FICA lockbox, there is not anything backing our currency. And all legislation was sent to Clinton by Republicans. Your memory is not very good.
And Foley's successor, a Democrat! resigned over an adultery scandal. Not one, but two different women, too! The Illinois governor indicted, NY's governor resigned because of prostitution, New Jersey's governor indicted, New Orleans rep 90k bribe and indicted, the list of Democrats indicted and arrested in just the last ten years is endless, Dee. If I had to guess, I would say three hundred at least. In Mississippi alone, seventeen major Democrat players went to jail including an ex-state auditor, all with very strong ties to Hunter Biden, Gaffetastic Joe's son, as well as Hillary Clinton. Google Dickie Scruggs. They were bribing Democrat judges to get more Hurricane Katrina money. In other words, ROBBING hurricane victims, not texting their ADULT pages.
Dee, Democrats are indicted and arrested at a rate six times greater than Republicans. That is fact. It still doesn't relieve the very few Republicans that are corrupt from their date with the slammer, there are just so many more Democrats that are criminal, and Obama's staff is obviously included in that statement. Emanuel's 21 phone conversations with Blagojevich's chief of staff is pretty telling, too.
Since 1953, 100% of Democrat governors of Illinois have gone to prison. 4 of 4. The last Democrat governor to NOT go to prison was Adlai Stevenson II, he left office in 1953! In the same time frame, 1 of 5 Republican governors of Illinois. Ryan, the one right before Blagojevich was the only one, and Blaggo was under investigation right along with him. The Senate seat selling episode just sped up that date with a cell, he had a wiretap because of the Ryan crap.
The Obamessiah stated that he had no contact with Hot Rod, yet the Tuesday before Rod got busted, Barry was photographed touching foreheads with him. Dee, Barry's a crook, too.
2 Dogs,
ReplyDeleteHa Ha Ha!
Typical RNC strategy.
Take credit for all of the Clinton good during his admininstration and blame him for everything that happened in W´s administration.
Guess what! No one believes your revisionist history lessons! That is why your side LOST!!
2 Dogs said...
Dee, there was no surplus, there is no Santa Claus, nor an Easter Bunny. There is no FICA lockbox, there is not anything backing our currency. And all legislation was sent to Clinton by Republicans. Your memory is not very good.
LOLOLOLOL!!
ReplyDeleteAs I said, at least the Dems scandals are with adults, NOT Underage pages!
2Dogs said...
And Foley's successor, a Democrat! resigned over an adultery scandal. Not one, but two different women, too!
2D,
ReplyDeleteYou do not recall or have never heard of JFKs contributions to the Civil Rights Movement? Where have you been?
"The turbulent end of state-sanctioned racial discrimination was one of the most pressing domestic issues of Kennedy's era. The United States Supreme Court had ruled in 1954 that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. However, many schools, especially in southern states, did not obey the Supreme Court's judgment. Segregation on buses, in restaurants, movie theaters, bathrooms, and other public places remained. Kennedy supported racial integration and civil rights, and during the 1960 campaign he telephoned Coretta Scott King, wife of the jailed Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr., which perhaps drew some additional black support to his candidacy. John and Robert Kennedy's INTERVENTION secured the early release of King from jail.
In 1962, James Meredith tried to enroll at the University of Mississippi, but he was prevented from doing so by white students. Kennedy RESPONSED by sending some 400 federal marshals and 3,000 troops to ensure that Meredith could enroll in his first class. Kennedy also ASSIGNED federal marshals to PROTECT Freedom Riders.
On June 11, 1963, President Kennedy INTERVENED when Alabama Governor George Wallace blocked the doorway to the University of Alabama to stop two African American students, Vivian Malone and James Hood, from enrolling. George Wallace moved aside after being confronted by federal marshals, Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach and the Alabama National Guard. That evening Kennedy GAVE his famous civil rights address on national television and radio. Kennedy PROPOSED what would become the Civil Rights Act of 1964."
Surely YOU could not FAULT him for being assassinated before HIS Legislation passed in 1964.
ReplyDeleteDee, if you believe that there ever was a surplus in our federal budget since the 1950s and the beginning of the Interstate highway system, you are in desperate need of Librium to stem your hallucinations.
ReplyDeleteI am unsure what I am trying to give credit to Bush for that you deem is due to Clinton. That was bizarre.
The page that Foley wound up resigning over was an adult, that means he was over 18, this is WHY there were no legal problems for Foley, Dee. There were other pages that came forward later, but all said that he never tried anything them, that they were just creeped out by his behavior. Absolutely no indictment at all, Dee. NONE. Foley was a freak, but nothing he did was illegal, it was an attempt at sex with an adult male. Foley was not charged with any crime, never indicted, just embarrassed for trying to get some loving.
Why did you not respond to any of the other things that I stated about the overwhelming number of Democrats GOING TO PRISON for their CRIMES? Is that not as much fun as making fun of a homosexual for you or something?
Back to Topic:
ReplyDeleteRush Limbaugh and the RNC will NOT see a Latino or minority vote ever, ever again if they continue these racist tactics!!
Dee, those responses are not legislation, I am also guessing that Robert Kennedy had more to do with that than JFK. And Meredith was assisted in his fight for enrollment at Ole Miss by John Oliver Emmerich, a Republican and one of the three Dixiecrats that left the Democrat Party, the other 50 stayed. Soooooo.
ReplyDeleteAnd again, Kennedy probably dreamed up some more stuff about letting those po' black folks go to school, too, but Dee, he accomplished NOTHING towards that. Intentions mean nothing to anyone that understands that it is action that is important.
As far as Kennedy's assassination is concerned, I do not believe that Oswald acted alone, but I do believe that Johnson was involved. All of my research leads straight back to Johnson and his dealings with the Brown family in Dallas.
TwoDogs,
ReplyDeleteNote when Dee is losing the arugment all of a sudden its "lets get back on topic"? She didn't mind being off topic herself just as long as she thought she was winning the argument but as soon as she gets showed up, she wants to get "back on topic".
Note her constant referral to "your side"? Like a broken record even though she knows that not all Republicans or anti's are radicals and in fact most are rational. She can't stand to admit that though so she continues with her worn out phrace of "your side". Really pathetec. Don't dare lump all Hispanics together though because she has a different set of rules about that. Next she will be calling you "hate-filled" in her "civil" blog, lol.
Anonymous, I do not have to lump all Hispanics together on this thread, Dee did that with the statement about Rush Limbaugh and the Magic Negro song keeping Hispanics from voting for Republicans.
ReplyDeleteTruly, I have no idea how that ties together, but obviously she does, even though Mexicans and Blacks in the areas of concentration commit violent acts against each other more than they do against whites. But, I guess that makes sense to her.
Rush the magic addict
ReplyDeletelives for codeine
And begging to the pharmacist
for oxy or morphine
Little empty bottles
makes my life so tough
And bring me green and yellow ones and other fancy stuff
…And frolicked in the media waste with a tool called bigotry
Very, very good satire, you should get your own radio show for that one. You lose it with the bigotry thing, though.
ReplyDeleteBut, if you do publish this, Rush is sure not to win reelection......dang.
Didn't Rush kick his "prescription" drug habit long ago? So why bring it up then? When did he throw his hat in the ring to run for public office?
ReplyDelete2 Dogs,
ReplyDeleteYou must like it here. Is your blog lonely?
Actually your comments are much more interesting than the droning and whining of poor ole anonymous.
Your opinionated revisionist history doesn't surprise me. However, most Americans realize what a hero JFK was. He did champion civil rights and he was largely responsible for the development and eventual passage of the Civil Rights legislation in 1964, just months after he died. He also set the date for the man on the moon. That is why NASA pushed so hard to accomplish it in the 60s. And he did avert a war with the Russia, regardless of your opinion.
I do not agree with you that President Johnson was in any way involved with the assassination. I agree there probably was a conspiracy. I have read accounts of both the CIA and Cuban Nationals being involved and the actual shooter being in the sewer opening on the street just ahead of the vehicle. Oswald and Ruby were both patsies.
If you were a long time reader of my blog you would know JFK is a long time hero of mine, since childhood.
You may have your opinion of him but I will cherish my memories of him visiting my state capital and sending me an autographed picture.
Johnson reminds me of Bush in a way, both troubled men in troubled times.
Aardvark,
ReplyDeleteThank you for visiting. I saw your limerick on Kos. Right on target for ole Limpbutt!!
Two Dogs and an Aardvark said...
Rush the magic addict
lives for codeine
And begging to the pharmacist
for oxy or morphine
Little empty bottles
makes my life so tough
And bring me green and yellow ones and other fancy stuff
…And frolicked in the media waste with a tool called bigotry
December 28, 2008
My blog is not lonely, I just like to keep tabs on the crazies, Dee. And if I continued to just talk to those with whom I agree, I would never be able to convert anyone from darkness to the light.
ReplyDeleteDee, I am certainly unaware of any departure from actual history in my comments. While JFK might be a hero of yours, that in no way contributes credit for any of those things that you want him to have accomplished. Your wanting it does not make it true. The Cuban Missile crisis was his fault and he did very little to keep a nuclear apocalypse from happening, no matter what the "JFK is God" folks want to state. He was a good man, that is all.
And, if you do any research at all about NASA and the accomplishments that can be stretched beyond belief to attribute to Kennedy, the only one that you shall uncover is his statement about reaching the moon in the next decade. No money, no direction, no accomplishments during his lifetime that can be awarded to his ACTIONS. Words are nothing to me, actions are the only important thing.
As far as Kennedy's assassination, there are plenty of theories, all have one connection, that he was killed in Dallas where Johnson's ties were strong. Route changes, slowing down on corners, all of those things were a complete breakdown of SS protocol that could only come from one place.
Being a very good marksman, I know Oswald did not place three rounds in that car in four seconds with a bolt-action rifle because it is impossible. There is definitely another explanation. Forty-five years is an awful long time to cover up a full blown government conspiracy, especially when most of the time Democrats have been in charge.
I have yet to see anything troubling about George W. Bush at all, other than he is a big government spender and has very little influence over the out and out falsehoods published in mainstream media about situations. Sedition used to be a crime, if it still were, the New York Times and MSNBC would have no employees.
So presenting my opinion and facts are "whining" now? Nice respect you show for your blog members. Civility? lol.
ReplyDeleteI haven't whined about anything. I give my input just as the rest do in here. My posts must really hit a nerve of truth with you. Good, that means you have lost any arguments starting right with your hypocricy about all Republicans and anti's being nasty racists but all the while demanding that all Latinos don't be lumped together.
Anon,
ReplyDeleteI will give you one thing.
You are persistent.
Why dont you tell us all about yourself.
Are you male or female? Married? Childrem? Immigrant? Or child, grandchild of immigrants?
Why are you so persistent?
You can tell us without revealing who you are.
Just give us some insights.
Hey... we want to know.
All 10,000 viewers of my blog!
I am a female and happily married. I am not an immigrant as I was born here and so were several generations of my family. Most Americans are not immigrants, they are born here Americans. I have children and want to leave them with the best possible future in this country. I am concerned about the state of affairs our country is in on many issues and am concerned about the future of this country because of the direction it has been heading in for some time now. I am extremely interested in politics because our politics will dictate what direction our country will take in the future. I like to debate CIVILLY and don't appreciate name calling but I will give it back if it is thrown at me first. I don't like people who twist the truth, lie and spin. Is that enough for you?
ReplyDeleteYou have 10,000 viewers but only a handful of members?
I had been reading this blog for awhile but hadn't decided to post until recently. I see where you have had many good members leave because of the personal attacks in here. Heated debate is one thing, name calling is entirely something else, especially when it is unwarranted. That is not being civil.
ReplyDeleteAnon,
ReplyDeleteYes. And my reports say the numbers keep growing. Just google my blog name and you will see the number of searches I recieve on that name alone. Most of my regular viewers have me saved under their favorites.
Most viewers read, some write me. Many of the PRO commenters are attacked when they first join and prefer not to participate in the discussion. Some of them send me ideas/suggestions on what to write and other bloggers ask me if I would add them to my blogrolls. I am also a member of the PRO Blogosphere.
I comment on discussion boards all over the country. I have been asked to blog on other blogs too.
I do have a group of ANTIs that follow me. A couple (who have since dropped) followed me in hopes they would attack me enough so I would stop blogging. Obviously they failed. I like the regular ANTIs like Ulty and Liquid although many of my PRO followers do not. They both write me too.
My Mission provides my reason for blogging. My bio provides my background.
Anonymous said..You have 10,000 viewers but only a handful of members?
Still with supposedly 10,000 viewers you would think that there would be more participants in here. What do the pro's have to be afraid of if they are so sure they are right on the immigration issue? I find that most of them from other blogs that I post on cannot debate with civility. That is why you lost a few long time anti members in here. You promised civility but they didn't get it from you and some of the other pro's that have posted in here occasionly. Liquidmicro is pretty much finished in here in case you have noticed already. He deserves a lot more respect then you give him or Ultima.
ReplyDeleteAnon,
ReplyDeleteI guess you dont understand blogs. I suggest you start one. Perhaps then you will understand.
Take 2 Dogs for example. His blog is one of the most popular in his state, yet, he has just a smattering of comments on his posts, far fewer than I do.
Did you google my blog name? Obviously my feedback doesnt convince you. Perhaps google will.
What you are Missing is most people do not like to get bashed. Your side tends to bash hard and you do not like when you get beat in an argument. Then you never admit when you lost.
My viewers like my responses to people like you and Pat and Ali and others who left. They leave and I won. So sad. Too bad. And in the end, I encourage ALL of my followers to stay civil and stay in the fight and WE WILL WIN the argument in the end because we have Right, and Justice, and the American Way on Our Side!! WE CAN STAND UP TO BULLIES LIKE YOU AND OTHERS ON YOUR SIDE!! AND WIN!!
SI SE PUEDE!!!!
Anonymous said...
Still with supposedly 10,000 viewers you would think that there would be more participants in here. What do the pro's have to be afraid of if they are so sure they are right on the immigration issue?
No, it is the pro side that usually starts with the bashing just like you do in here. The anti side then bashes back. Keep the initial bashers and the retaliating bashes in the proper order please. I posted in a couple of blogs that favor the pro side and I was civil, no bashing.
ReplyDeleteFirst I was called a troll and then my posts were deleted because my views didn't agree with the majority in there. I rest my case.
The members that left here didn't leave because they lost any arguments. Who is to say who won and who lost anyway...you? They left for the reason that I stated. Your mission blog statement says debates will be civil when they weren't on the part of the pro's in here including you.
See what I mean? You just proved that I was right! You just called me a bully and for what? You call that civil? I haven't bullied you or anyone else in here. I am just stating the facts of why people leave this blog.
You don't have truth, justice and the American way on your side when you have no respect for our laws and put illegal foreigners above the citizens of this country.
Just out of curiosity, 'anti' and 'pro' what exactly?
ReplyDeleteYep.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
Who is to say who won and who lost anyway...you?
2D,
ReplyDeletePRO or ANTI CIR (Comprehensive Immigration Reform).
Two Dogs said...
Just out of curiosity, 'anti' and 'pro' what exactly?
We have a problem with immigration? I was not aware. We certainly need comprehensive criminal extradition policy reform though.
ReplyDeleteIt takes a big inflated ego to claim that they are right without the judgement of unbiased outsiders who have the facts and truth on their side, doesn't it? Lets just let all criminals judge themselves then without a judge or jury then shall we?
ReplyDeleteActually the common usage of the word anti in regards to immigration is that they are anti-illegal immigration not necessarily anti CIR. It all depends on what is in any CIR legislation. We certainly don't want the kind that the pro's do.
Pro usually means that you want amnesty for illegal aliens, you fight border security (especially any physcial barrier) and any internal enforcement of our immigration laws stoppped. Does that clear it up for you TwoDogs?
There is someone that actually refers to themselves as Pro-criminal behavior and someone that refers to themselves as Anti-criminal behavior?
ReplyDeleteSounds like a uber-dumb debate to me, but what the Hell do I know?
I prefer to call myself pro-laws and pro-America.
ReplyDeleteActually I provided the correct explanation of PRO and ANTI. I posted it on my blog over a year ago. Its been published in a textbook.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous just puts her own interpretation which the ANTIs often do. They choose to demonize the PROs, call everything but mass deportation amnesty and lie and say our side is open borders. I think they call it OBLs for open borders or something like that. All just pure spin.
Anon,
ReplyDeleteYour name calling is getting tiring and your spinning is just off the wall.
You say you have problems when you go on other PRO blogs? I am not surprised with your attitude, inability to understand feedback and your continued spinning of the comments.
Keep to the topic or you will be deleted.
You are so negative and appear to hate being here. Why do you stay?
You might try going over to Hrans blog. He likes people like you.
Anonymous said...
..bashes
...no respect for our laws
...big inflated ego to claim that they are right without the judgement of unbiased outsiders who have the facts and truth on their side, doesn't it? Lets just let all criminals judge themselves then without a judge or jury then shall we?
Better yet, start your own blog. It is easy. Just go to eBlogger and get started.
ReplyDeleteGood Luck!