Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Chris Matthews is a Big Fat Idiot! Part 2!

I just posted this on MSNBC.com:

Hillary WON New Hampshire because she "got real." She connected with WE THE PEOPLE!
I am so sick of some people in the media, especially Matthews, Tucker, Scarborough and the extremist Buchanan. These "boys" and Many media pundits were drooling at the thought of Hillary´s defeat and her crying about it. You could see Matthews drooling out of the sides of his mouth as he spit all over his guests. Haw Haw! Tucker was hopping up and down like a rubber ball on crack. Scarborough was overtalking beautiful Mika and gloating at Hillary´s demise, barely letting her speak a word as she edged to get a word in over the top of his right elbow.
Tucker "This sets back Feminism" when Hillary teared up. As Tucker Boy sweated and spouted and his voice cracked like the weak girly boy he is!
Tonight, Matthews went over the top. He started today by trying to say this was an Obama Race Card vs a Hillary Woman-Feminism issue moment. WHAT AN IDIOT!! When Buchanan disputed the racism factor, the drooling idiot Matthews said, "Pat Buchanan, you are a Liberal, Alan Alda kinda guy."
What is Matthews smoking? Is he on Crack!?! There can be no other explanation for such a Delirious Exclamation by Matthews about Buchanan!!
Buchanan, author of the racist "State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America," one of the leaders of the racist ANTI Immigration groups, brother of Bay, Leader of One of Tanton´s groups "Pro America PAC", is a Racist who fears the word Racist. Of course he is going to argue against this word, in any terms, in any scenario.
What happened in New Hampshire is, voters rallied and proved the Pollsters wrong, embarrassingly wrong. Hillary connected with the voters, as Obama connects with the voters. Don´t you guys get it? Don´t you understand the privacy of the voting booth? Don´t you understand we are the Land of the Free? Home of the Brave? Don´t you understand you make your money off of predicting your own agendas? Don´t you understand that WE THE PEOPLE can choose? We the People will Vote? And We the People will Elect our Next President in the Polling Booths and not in your Breaking News moment you so relish?
There is Racism in America. There is animosity against women by not only you pundits like Matthews, Tucker and Scarborough, but by many people.
My advice to you MSNBC... get rid of Matthews, Tucker (get him off NOW! NOW!!!) and Scarborough!
We The People love the guy you don´t even understand... like Keith Olbermann! We like FAIR people like Tim Russert, Brian Williams, Tom Brokaw, Matt Lauer and Al Roker.
We like your women newspeople like Andrea Mitchell, Ann Currey, Meredith Vieira and Mika Brzezinski.
Come on MSNBC! Be on the side of the American People!We don´t expect much from Fox, but we hoped for more from NBC!

30 comments:

patriot said...

Every other word out of your mouth is either racist or racism. Talk about playing the race card to the hilt! Yeah, I know that is all your side has.

It truly amazes me how Hispanic Americans and their illegal counterparts constantly call Americans for the rule of law, racists but all the while being completely oblivious to their own racism of choosing the welfare of illegal aliens ethnically like themselves over that of their fellow American citizens and the laws of this country. It truly is mind-blowing.

Dee said...

Pat, Pat, Pat,
It is called studying the issues and then, responding, as is my 1st Ammendment right.

You do honor the Bill of Rights, don´t you Dear?

Dee said...

The whole point of this blog is, Chris Matthews, by his own statements, proves his own biases.

So Sad!!

patriot said...

Sure thing dee, it has nothing to do with the ethnocentricity and racism on the pro-illegals part, now does it? You just find bogus studies to support your agenda and disregard the rule of law.

Of course Matthews has a corner on the market of "biasness", right dee?

patriot said...

Oh and by the way, trying to get rid of Lou Dobbs didn't work out too well for you and yours did it? Now it's Matthews? Your side has no pull whatsoever and that is what kills you. Freedom of speech isn't just for the raza.

Dee said...

Pat, Pat, Pat,
People are sick of fake newspeople like Dobbs, Matthews and Limbaugh and others who push their own agenda. The only people who follow them are those who agree with their extremist agendas.

patriot said...

dee, dee, dee, and those of us who are for the rule of law are sick of people like Rick Sanchez and other brown supremists and brown supremists organizations.

Pushing their own agenda? No kidding, how profound. Do people usually push "other" people's agendas? Is this a switch from claiming that "they only do it for ratings"? Funny how you think it wrong for the anti's to push their agenda but ok for the pro's to push theirs.

ultima said...

"Hillary WON New Hampshire because she "got real." She connected with WE THE PEOPLE!"

Of course, that is one explanation but there are others. Brian Williams reported that the polls were wrong because people didn't want to admit that they were racist -- they had to publicly endorse Obama while intending all along to vote otherwise.

Dee, of WE the People, of course wasn't even there so she had nothing whatsoever to do with the outcome.

Some pundits say the folks in NH were just exercising their right to keep the election open and extended by voting for candidates other than those who won in Iowa. Who really knows. Maybe Bill Clinton had a major impact rather than Hillary.

Are you showing your feminist bias against Obama?

ultima said...

Most people who disagree with you are neither racist nor on pot, at least no more so than those who agree with you. Why use such inflammatory and inappropriate terms for all with whom you disagree? Have you no substantive arguments?

If you want to use those terms, you have to admit that they apply equally to the racists and idiots who support illegal aliens and the destruction of our country. Your descendants will rue the day you failed to step forward and and fight for the rule of law and for our national interest and sovereignty. If they are objective and know of your position, they will know that you and your ilk were the ones responsible for the demise of our great republic and its descent into joblessness and poverty like Mexico. Disloyalty may well be too weak a term for it.
What we have today may not be Mayberry but it is certain to be better than what follows from your enthusiastic and racist position opposed to what is needed to prevent America's slide into oblivion.

What do you think America will look like 100 years from now and by what reasoning do you arrive at that conclusion? What facts can you muster to support that position?

If you cannot do that, then your myopia means you are supporting the wrong cause.

Although I do not personally like Hillary as one of the questioners at the debate stated was true of people from NH, I do not say she would be a bad president. Sometimes the office makes the man or in this case the woman, but philosophically I am opposed to what she stands for and she is not the only one capable of leading this country. Most of what she and the other candidates say is just campaign rhetoric and has nothing to do with what they will really do in office when confronted with the nation's problems. That will depend to some extent on the quality of the people they select for the cabinet and other top officials. If they are just political cronies, as you like to call them, that will not bode well and we will be able to expect the same level of corruption and ineptitude as we have observed in other administrations.

ultima said...

You depict legitimate pundits as slobbering idiots. Shame on you. You have a low tolerance for anything you disagree with. Instead of studying the issues, you leap to unwarranted conclusions and are completely incapable of seeing any merit in another point of view.

Mika is beautiful but Tucker was "hopping up and down like a rubber ball on crack". Shame on you!

"this was an Obama Race Card vs a Hillary Woman-Feminism issue moment."

Actually, as I pointed out above, race may have been involved. One black man explained the polling errors on the basis of race.

patriot said...

Ultima, Mayberry represented "white America" a thought that dee can't stand and yet she and others who think like her turn around with their hypocritial remarks about us being afraid of the "browning" of America. Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black to me.

She is relishing a demographic change to this country from it's natural state and yet if we were to relish the same demographic change for Mexico, especially thru illegal immigration, we would be called racists for that. Can the hypocrisy get any deeper?

ultima said...

"Buchanan, author of the racist "State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America," one of the leaders of the racist ANTI Immigration groups, brother of Bay, Leader of One of Tanton´s groups "Pro America PAC", is a Racist who fears the word Racist. Of course he is going to argue against this word, in any terms, in any scenario."

Your problem is that you just can't accept the facts of Buchanan's writing. You cannot see what America will be like 100 years from now. Given all those out there who can't wait to use the term "racist" because of a lack of a substantive argument, it is not surprising when anyone in the pro-legal fold feels they have to defend themselves against these ad hominem attacks. Buchanan is an accepted commentator who plays an important role in informing the public about immigration issues, a more important role than amateurs or self-appointed experts because they have "studied the issues". After all their study all they can come up with is more name calling.

Paranoia is a big problem among the pro-illegals. It twists their thinking. It makes them feel that they are in danger of being rounded up and shipped off to concentration camps. How ludicrous! Their one dimensional thinking grossly misleads them about the future of America - either that or they don't care as long as their race is in charge - Mexico Norte forever.

ultima said...

"And We the People will Elect our Next President in the Polling Booths and not in your Breaking News moment you so relish?"

Tell that to Brian Williams. Of course everyone understands the privacy of the voting booth but a public hungry for election results creates a demand for post-voting surveys to see who can predict the winner first. That may not be journalistic competition at its best but there it is for better or worse. Nothing new in the NH election in that regard.

ultima said...

"We The People love the guy you don´t even understand... like Keith Olbermann! We like FAIR people like Tim Russert, Brian Williams, Tom Brokaw, Matt Lauer and Al Roker. We like your women newspeople like Andrea Mitchell, Ann Currey, Meredith Vieira and Mika Brzezinski."

As I pointed out in another post, these folks are no more fair than the next guys. Their biases can easily be shown by the proportion of time given to reporting on the various candidates and parties. Ask anyone and they will tell you liberalism is endemic in the Nightly News, and Al Roker is a joke.

ultima said...

"Don´t you guys get it? Don´t you understand the privacy of the voting booth? Don´t you understand we are the Land of the Free? Home of the Brave? Don´t you understand you make your money off of predicting your own agendas? Don´t you understand that WE THE PEOPLE can choose? We the People will Vote?"

Getting a little hysterical here, Aren't we?

ultima said...

"The whole point of this blog is, Chris Matthews, by his own statements, proves his own biases."

As do yours.

Dee said...

Ulty,
I go post on Digby sometimes and many on that site agree with me. Some from NH.

Here is an example:
"As it turns out, my sudden, almost primal defensiveness about Hillary Clinton may not have been unique, but part of a larger wave of sentiment that swept her to a surprise victory in New Hampshire on Tuesday night. Others like me, who were "not Hillary supporters, but ...," were downright mortified by the eagerness with which cable news networks, the New York Times, the Boston Globe and even her opponents felt free to declare Clinton yesterday's news."

Dee said...

My opposition is to the MSM´s utter glee at the possibility of HCs demise. I like BHO and the bad boy WJC.

Dee said...

Matthews, Tucker and Buchanan are in the public eye. They pretend to be newspeople. They pretend to be unbiased. They are fair game when they put on their cheerleader skirts and jump up and down to crucify one candidate.

mirrorism said...

Ultima, nobody switched sides in the private voting booths. Obama's NH poll numbers were right on the money; between 1 and 2 points off the final results. The pollsters were wrong predicting Hillary's support, which jumped as much as 10 points.

Dee said...

Ulty,
BTW, you call me "amateur"?
Hah! Hardly!
ANTI´s like you should know that I am a "PRO"!

(LOL)

ultima said...

"Ultima, nobody switched sides in the private voting booths. Obama's NH poll numbers were right on the money; between 1 and 2 points off the final results. The pollsters were wrong predicting Hillary's support, which jumped as much as 10 points."

If true, I wonder why the newscasters made the point the I mentioned. Maybe it wasn't they who did but rather an idle black observer who with insufficient information was trying to explain the major turnaround.

ultima said...

"BTW, you call me "amateur"?
Hah! Hardly!
ANTI´s like you should know that I am a "PRO"! "

When will I see you as a paid commentator on CNN? I think amateur fits pretty well.

ultima said...

"They are fair game when they put on their cheerleader skirts and jump up and down to crucify one candidate."

This much we can agree on if you include the liberal media like Brian Williams,et.al.

ultima said...

You were right in chastising those folks including Brian Williams who got egg on their faces for leaping to conclusions. This experience should give the pollsters something more to think about - such as how likely are to to vote in the primary. I think they already do that to some extent but haven't been able to come up with the tools necessary to achieve a better degree of predictive precision, even within the statistical margin of error.

dianne said...

These guys are tv personalities, period. Watch C-span. Watch the House and Senate floor debates. Listen to the speeches they give. Write them letters and see how they respond, if they respond. I can't stand Chris Matthews. He is so wrapped up in himself, he can't see beyond his nose. Keith Olbermann is a rabid liberal who hates all conservatives. Tucker is an admitted libertarian. Brian Williams at least had the moxie to admit his enthrallment with Obama and perhaps get back to the business of reporting the news instead of influencing it.

Anyone who cannot formulate an informed opinion based on his own research is destined to be a sheep led to the slaughter.

Dee said...

Ulty,
Maybe I am!

Ulty´s quote:
When will I see you as a paid commentator on CNN?

mirrorism said...

I think they made it to insinuate that the results of the NH primary are an example of the "Bradley effect."

Either way, recounts have been requested by Dennis Kucinich - most likely to help out Obama - and some local politicians for the Republicans - possibly Romney or Paul behind that one.

mirrorism said...

Here's another "myth breaker" rebutting the accusations that Obama is either a radical Muslim or a racist Christian.

Sliming Obama

patriot said...

Just another opinion piece. There are just as many opinion pieces that say the opposite. The truth will come out if he gets the Democrat nomination or even maybe before. If Hillary is smart she will make it her business to find out the truth. But she is toast anyway after today.

Page Hits