Monday, May 17, 2010

The Racial Profiling and Carnage of sb1070

I think it is extremely important to understand the content of sb1070. After all, FAIR's Kris Kobach wrote the bill and his intent is Attrition through Enforcement = Mass Deportation. Kobach delights in the fact that he is "going to make their lives a living hell" with this bill.

Read the section of the bill below. When this bill is enacted, it will force every person giving anyone a ride in their car to ask every Brown person for their passport. Why? If you are stopped and a person in your car has lapsed papers and you kind of know their papers are lapsed, the police are going to arrest you, take your car and fine you. This is like being arrested because someone in your car doesn't have Car Insurance.

Remember, 40% of the 12M are Visa Overstays. Most of the 12M have been here 5 - 20 years. They may be trying to correct their status. Or maybe it's your brother-in-law. You can never give him a ride again. You can never invite him into your home. Or maybe it's your neighbors children. You can't carpool. Or maybe they belong to your church. The church can be found guilty. You are a legal citizen and you may know a few people at your Thanksgiving family dinner. Now they can arrest ALL of you. No wonder Arpaio is salivating at the thought of the next suppression sweeps in Latino towns once this bill is enacted. He will take all of their cars, charge them with a class 1 misdemeanor and force them to pay $1,000 fine for EACH person there. Imagine the carnage!
From sb1070:
Unlawful transporting, moving, concealing, harboring or shielding of unlawful aliens; vehicle impoundment; classification
A. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR A PERSON WHO IS IN VIOLATION OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE TO:
1. TRANSPORT OR MOVE OR ATTEMPT TO TRANSPORT OR MOVE AN ALIEN IN THIS STATE IN A MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION IF THE PERSON KNOWS OR RECKLESSLY
DISREGARDS THE FACT THAT THE ALIEN HAS COME TO, HAS ENTERED OR REMAINS IN THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF LAW.
2. CONCEAL, HARBOR OR SHIELD OR ATTEMPT TO CONCEAL, HARBOR OR SHIELD AN ALIEN FROM DETECTION IN ANY PLACE IN THIS STATE, INCLUDING ANY BUILDING OR ANY MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION, IF THE PERSON KNOWS OR RECKLESSLY DISREGARDS THE FACT THAT THE ALIEN HAS COME TO, HAS ENTERED OR REMAINS IN THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF LAW.
3. ENCOURAGE OR INDUCE AN ALIEN TO COME TO OR RESIDE IN THIS STATE IF THE PERSON KNOWS OR RECKLESSLY DISREGARDS THE FACT THAT SUCH COMING TO,
ENTERING OR RESIDING IN THIS STATE IS OR WILL BE IN VIOLATION OF LAW.
B. A MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION THAT IS USED IN THE COMMISSION OF A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS SUBJECT TO MANDATORY VEHICLE IMMOBILIZATION OR IMPOUNDMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 28-3511.
C. A PERSON WHO VIOLATES THIS SECTION IS GUILTY OF A CLASS 1
MISDEMEANOR AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE OF AT LEAST ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS, EXCEPT THAT A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION THAT INVOLVES TEN OR MORE ILLEGAL ALIENS IS A CLASS 6 FELONY AND THE PERSON IS SUBJECT TO A FINE OF AT LEAST ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR EACH ALIEN WHO IS INVOLVED.

7 comments:

Dee said...

The ANTIs are going to comment, "Well what do you expect for harboring illeegals!" As I said, this bill will jail family members. Take their cars. Make them criminals for feeding their family.

Vicente Duque said...

Videos : Seattle ( in the State of Washington ) boycotts Arizona for Business and Travel. See the Map of Boycotting cities

Mox News : Unfair and Biased !

MoxNewsDotCom — May 17, 2010 — http://MOXNews.com/ May 17, 2010 Q13 FOX News

Seattle Joins Arizona Boycott!


KOMOcommunities — May 17, 2010 — The Seattle City Council unanimously voted to boycott Arizona in protest of their recent crackdown on illegal immigration.

Seattle City Council votes to boycott Arizona


cjdallas21 — May 17, 2010 — The city of Seattle join the boycott against Arizona.

Seattle Boycotts Arizona

You can see these videos in YouTube.com or you can find them directly here :

Raciality.com

Vicente Duque



Vicente Duque

ultima said...

I think the bill is still quite weak as long as it uses the words "know or recklessly disregards." What's to prevent anyone from saying, "I didn't know". How do you prove that some has "recklessly disregarded" the status of individual. Those words should never have been in the bill because they represent a major loophole.

Passengers have no greater obligation than the driver himself. If a driver routinely transports others, he just needs to inspect their documents once to make sure they have them and that the visa has no expired.

As I stated before, the issue here is not the imposition represented by a check of bona fides but rather a general objection to the idea of detecting, apprehending, and turning over to ICE illegal aliens. The just want anyone who has made it across the border illegally to be left alone. That's what I call gross disloyalty.

ultima said...

I don't believe one should be allowed to "correct one's status" while he or she is residing in the U.S. illegally. That should only be possible in one's homeland. Also, if a visa has expired, than one can correct that situation by leaving forthwith.

ultima said...

This is perhaps one of the most efffective provisions of the law. Otherwise, a person with the proper credentials could have a van load of illegals and the officer wouldn't be allowed to inquire about their immigration status which is what you are suggesting.

Dee said...

Weak?? How do you figure? We already know what arpaio is doing without this bill. With this bill he will be arresting family members right and left. If this bill is enacted he will be in his glory terrorizing latino neighborhoods.

rpkinmd said...

I say go Joe. People here illegally need to be arersted and deported with no due process just like Mexicao does. Bob

Page Hits